Efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) develop relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease after receiving initial induction chemotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is the only curative therapy for R/R AML. Mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) is the current standard of care salvage regimen for R/R AML at Cleveland Clinic. The primary objective was to determine the overall remission rate (ORR: defined as patients achieving complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)) in R/R AML patients who received MEC. METHODS: Adult patients with R/R AML treated with MEC between July 1, 2014 and September 30, 2022 were included. ORR and its association with baseline characteristics were determined. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and safety. RESULTS: Sixty patients were evaluated. The ORR was 51.7% (33.3% CR and 18.3% CRi). The median time from receipt of MEC to CR/CRi was 7.7 weeks. Patients with bone marrow blasts ≤20% and peripheral blood blasts ≤30% at MEC initiation were more than twice as likely to achieve CR/CRi compared to those with a higher blast burden. The median OS was 6.3 months. Twenty-four (40.0%) patients proceeded to alloHSCT. Twenty-one (35.0%) patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) during their admission. CONCLUSIONS: MEC is an effective salvage regimen for patients with R/R AML, especially among those with low disease burden at initiation. Febrile neutropenia, infections, and severe oral mucositis were common with MEC administration.

Peripheral neuropathy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving vincristine with and without aprepitant/fosaprepitant.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral neuropathy is a common treatment-related adverse effect associated with vincristine. Vincristine is a major CYP3A4 substrate and is often administered alongside the neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonists, aprepitant or fosaprepitant, which are moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors. This inhibition may result in increased concentrations of vincristine and an increased incidence of toxicity. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to investigate if there is a clinically significant drug interaction between vincristine and aprepitant or fosaprepitant resulting in early-onset peripheral neuropathy. The secondary objective of this study was to investigate the cumulative rate of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). METHODOLOGY: This was a single-centered, retrospective, cohort chart review. Patients receiving vincristine-based chemotherapy between 1 July 2010 through 30 June 2018 were identified and reviewed for concomitant use of aprepitant or fosaprepitant and incidence of neuropathy. Early-onset CIPN was defined as neuropathy onset during the first cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 115 subjects were retrospectively reviewed over the study period, of whom 71 were included in the aprepitant/fosaprepitant group and 44 were included in the group without a NK-1 receptor antagonist. Of the subjects who received aprepitant/fosaprepitant, 26.7% experienced early-onset peripheral neuropathy as compared to 22.7% in the group without a NK-1 receptor antagonist (P = 0.627). Overall, CIPN was higher in the group who received aprepitant/fosaprepitant compared to the group without (56% vs. 36%, P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: There appears to be an increased risk of CIPN with the concomitant use of vincristine and aprepitant or fosaprepitant.